ο‚›GitHub

Metric manifold

A Riemannian manifold always consists of a topological manifold together with a smoothly varying metric $g$.

However, often there is an implicitly assumed (default) metric, like the usual inner product on Euclidean space. This decorator takes this into account. It is not necessary to use this decorator if you implement just one (or the first) metric. If you later introduce a second, the old (first) metric can be used with the (non MetricManifold) AbstractManifold, i.e. without an explicitly stated metric.

This manifold decorator serves two purposes:

  1. to implement different metrics (e.g. in closed form) for one AbstractManifold
  2. to provide a way to compute geodesics on manifolds, where this AbstractMetric does not yield closed formula.

Note that a metric manifold is has a IsConnectionManifold trait referring to the LeviCivitaConnection of the metric $g$, and thus a large part of metric manifold's functionality relies on this.

Let's first look at the provided types.

Types

Manifolds.IsMetricManifold β€” Type
IsMetricManifold <: AbstractTrait

Specify that a certain decorated Manifold is a metric manifold in the sence that it provides explicit metric properties, extending/changing the default metric properties of a manifold.

source
Manifolds.MetricManifold β€” Type
MetricManifold{𝔽,M<:AbstractManifold{𝔽},G<:AbstractMetric} <: AbstractDecoratorManifold{𝔽}

Equip a AbstractManifold explicitly with an AbstractMetricG.

For a Metric AbstractManifold, by default, assumes, that you implement the linear form from local_metric in order to evaluate the exponential map.

If the corresponding AbstractMetricG yields closed form formulae for e.g. the exponential map and this is implemented directly (without solving the ode), you can of course still implement that directly.

Constructor

MetricManifold(M, G)

Generate the AbstractManifoldM as a manifold with the AbstractMetricG.

source

Implement Different Metrics on the same Manifold

In order to distinguish different metrics on one manifold, one can introduce two AbstractMetrics and use this type to dispatch on the metric, see SymmetricPositiveDefinite. To avoid overhead, one AbstractMetric can then be marked as being the default, i.e. the one that is used, when no MetricManifold decorator is present. This avoids reimplementation of the first existing metric, access to the metric-dependent functions that were implemented using the undecorated manifold, as well as the transparent fallback of the corresponding MetricManifold with default metric to the undecorated implementations. This does not cause any runtime overhead. Introducing a default AbstractMetric serves a better readability of the code when working with different metrics.

Implementation of Metrics

For the case that a local_metric is implemented as a bilinear form that is positive definite, the following further functions are provided, unless the corresponding AbstractMetric is marked as default – then the fallbacks mentioned in the last section are used for e.g. the exponential map.

Manifolds.det_local_metric β€” Method
det_local_metric(M::AbstractManifold, p, B::AbstractBasis)

Return the determinant of local matrix representation of the metric tensor $g$, i.e. of the matrix $G(p)$ representing the metric in the tangent space at $p$ with as a matrix.

See also local_metric

source
Manifolds.flat β€” Method
flat(N::MetricManifold{M,G}, p, X::TFVector)

Compute the musical isomorphism to transform the tangent vector X from the AbstractManifoldM equipped with AbstractMetricG to a cotangent by computing

\[X^β™­= G_p X,\]

where $G_p$ is the local matrix representation of G, see local_metric

source
Manifolds.inverse_local_metric β€” Method
inverse_local_metric(M::AbstractcManifold{𝔽}, p, B::AbstractBasis)

Return the local matrix representation of the inverse metric (cometric) tensor of the tangent space at p on the AbstractManifoldM with respect to the AbstractBasis basis B.

The metric tensor (see local_metric) is usually denoted by $G = (g_{ij}) ∈ 𝔽^{dΓ—d}$, where $d$ is the dimension of the manifold.

Then the inverse local metric is denoted by $G^{-1} = g^{ij}$.

source
Manifolds.local_metric β€” Method
local_metric(M::AbstractManifold{𝔽}, p, B::AbstractBasis)

Return the local matrix representation at the point p of the metric tensor $g$ with respect to the AbstractBasisB on the AbstractManifoldM. Let $d$denote the dimension of the manifold and $b_1,\ldots,b_d$ the basis vectors. Then the local matrix representation is a matrix $G\in 𝔽^{nΓ—n}$ whose entries are given by $g_{ij} = g_p(b_i,b_j), i,j\in\{1,…,d\}$.

This yields the property for two tangent vectors (using Einstein summation convention) $X = X^ib_i, Y=Y^ib_i \in T_p\mathcal M$ we get $g_p(X, Y) = g_{ij} X^i Y^j$.

source
Manifolds.local_metric_jacobian β€” Method
local_metric_jacobian(
    M::AbstractManifold,
    p,
    B::AbstractBasis;
    backend::AbstractDiffBackend,
)

Get partial derivatives of the local metric of M at p in basis B with respect to the coordinates of p, $\frac{βˆ‚}{βˆ‚ p^k} g_{ij} = g_{ij,k}$. The dimensions of the resulting multi-dimensional array are ordered $(i,j,k)$.

source
Manifolds.log_local_metric_density β€” Method
log_local_metric_density(M::AbstractManifold, p, B::AbstractBasis)

Return the natural logarithm of the metric density $ρ$ of M at p, which is given by $ρ = \log \sqrt{|\det [g_{ij}]|}$ for the metric tensor expressed in basis B.

source
Manifolds.ricci_curvature β€” Method
ricci_curvature(M::AbstractManifold, p, B::AbstractBasis; backend::AbstractDiffBackend = default_differential_backend())

Compute the Ricci scalar curvature of the manifold M at the point p using basis B. The curvature is computed as the trace of the Ricci curvature tensor with respect to the metric, that is $R=g^{ij}R_{ij}$ where $R$ is the scalar Ricci curvature at p, $g^{ij}$ is the inverse local metric (see inverse_local_metric) at p and $R_{ij}$ is the Riccie curvature tensor, see ricci_tensor. Both the tensor and inverse local metric are expressed in local coordinates defined by B, and the formula uses the Einstein summation convention.

source
Manifolds.sharp β€” Method
sharp(N::MetricManifold{M,G}, p, ΞΎ::CoTFVector)

Compute the musical isomorphism to transform the cotangent vector ΞΎ from the AbstractManifoldM equipped with AbstractMetricG to a tangent by computing

\[ΞΎ^β™― = G_p^{-1} ΞΎ,\]

where $G_p$ is the local matrix representation of G, i.e. one employs inverse_local_metric here to obtain $G_p^{-1}$.

source
ManifoldsBase.inner β€” Method
inner(N::MetricManifold{M,G}, p, X, Y)

Compute the inner product of X and Y from the tangent space at p on the AbstractManifoldM using the AbstractMetricG. If M has G as its IsDefaultMetric trait, this is done using inner(M, p, X, Y), otherwise the local_metric(M, p) is employed as

\[g_p(X, Y) = ⟨X, G_p Y⟩,\]

where $G_p$ is the loal matrix representation of the AbstractMetricG.

source

Metrics, charts and bases of vector spaces

Metric-related functions, similarly to connection-related functions, need to operate in a basis of a vector space, see here.

Metric-related functions can take bases of associated tangent spaces as arguments. For example local_metric can take the basis of the tangent space it is supposed to operate on instead of a custom basis of the space of symmetric bilinear operators.